For over a year, I have halted from writing on this blog. But I have not stopped from studying about Orthodoxy. However, it has been a constant roller-coaster; some days I feel positive about what the Orthodox Church teaches; but other days, not so much.
Sometimes I find myself wondering, "what is the truth?" The Orthodox Church says one thing, but those from the Evangelical circles say another. Some stuff sometimes are proven, while others are often disproven. I find myself going in circles and sometimes I feel that I'd like to start all over so that I can examine more closely and understand better the history and theology from both sides. Because often I feel like my brain has become muck... and I comprehend nothing, which leads to constant frustration.
Is there a winning side? What if, instead of rivals, the West and East are really complements to each other? Could that be possible? I'd like to think that, but at the same time, I'm not sure if it is possible to reconcile.
When I first started looking into Orthodoxy, I remember this feeling of awe, this feeling of, "I have finally found what I have been looking for." I remember reading and thinking, "I recognize Christ here! He is here, I see Him in the lives of the Saints. I see Him in history of the Church, in the teachings of the Church. This is where I need to go to experience Christ!" And even after 2 years of just reading about Orthodoxy, I still feel that way.
However, the recurring issue is that I cannot defend my reason to wanting to go to the Orthodox Church. And it is frustrating. Frustrating because while I know that reason doesn't always go in hand with faith, there has to be good solid reasons for WHY I believe what I believe about the Christian faith. So far, I haven't been able to give good solid reasons, and in all honesty, I believe that I need to be as honest as possible if I am to continue on this exploration.
SO...
I will attempt again to make sense of why I even commenced Reverting the Reformation. What is the truth? Who has the truth? And is there a True Church founded by the Lord Jesus Christ, Son of God?
Kyrie Eleison.
Reverting the Reformation
Going beyond the Reformation, Going beyond the Great Schism
Saturday, October 3, 2015
Wednesday, July 9, 2014
Discovering the Roots of Christian Orthodoxy: Judaism
For some time now I've been trying to be consistent in my reading
and studying on the Orthodox Church. And quite recently, I've been devoting
some time to "Surprised by Christ:: : My Journey from Judaism to Orthodox Christianity" by Fr A. James Bernstein, a Jewish
convert to Orthodoxy. Coming from a Zionist Evangelical Protestant background,
Fr A. James Bernstein's story on his journey to Orthodoxy has
thus far been inspiring, and has helped propel me to continue on my exploration
on Orthodoxy.
From a very young age, I was taught to have a respect for the
nation of Israel; a love for the Jewish people was loosely instilled in me due
to the facts that Jesus was a Jew and that Salvation comes from the Jews (John
4:22). Growing up, my mother was big on movies about Jews, especially films on the Holocaust. Messianic music was also something that tended to echo
throughout the house; Joel Shernof was and still is my mother's favorite. At
church, the emphasize of the nation of Israel still being God's chosen was not
lacking. And while we weren't hard core Zionists (we weren't sending money for
Zionist agendas, or mixing in politics), we definitely were encouraged to hold
the view that Israel is God's chosen, that Israel has every right to the land
of Israel (Israel, not Palestine) and that the Rapture is not the Second
Coming, but a separate event in the end of times. There was a point in my life
when I even wanted to live on a kibbutz and learn Hebrew.
As naive and young as I was, I kind of thought I knew enough about
Judaism. I knew I didn't know all that is needed to know what Judaism is about
(and I still don't), but I thought that my interpretation of the Bible and what
I was taught at home and at church was enough justification for me to hold that
view. However, it wasn't until in the
recent two years that I came to realize my perception of the nation of Israel
and Judaism were extremely distorted. I was going through a spiritual crisis; I
had come to realize that my view of Christian Zionism was a pretty double-standard
theological view. I realized that there was something wrong with my theological
view. I realized I wasn't satisfied for a reason, and from there I commenced to
question my Zionist Evangelical Protestant faith, and I started searching for
the Truth, on and off, until God brought to my attention Orthodoxy.
Now, by reading "Surprised by Christ", so far my realization
that I don't know enough about Judaism has been accented. In his book, Fr James dedicates portions in which he describes how Christian Orthodoxy has its origins in Orthodox Judaism and how
Orthodoxy is the fulfillment of Orthodox Judaism. In chapter 9,
"Worship in the Ancient Church", he is descriptive of how the early
Christians worshiped, citing various primary sources that were clear that
worship in the Ancient Church was extremely different to how the many various
Protestant churches worship today. In chapter 12, "Orthodoxy: Jewish and
Christian", he goes into depth on how Scriptural worship in the Orthodox
Church is and her roots in Jewish Orthodoxy. In these two chapters, he
demonstrates the historical continuity of the Orthodox faith as well as her
connection to Jewish worship, two points that as a Zionist Evangelical
Protestant Christian have helped me to push me to keep exploring Orthodoxy.
In chapter 12, Fr James writes,
"Jewish worship was always physical. The Old Testament people of
God worshiped with music, with color, with light and candles, with sweet aroma
and incense, with art, with rhythmic chant, with feasts and fasts, with cycles
of holy days, and with godly order and liturgy. I came to realize these things
were neither pagan in origin nor temporal in character . They were fulfilled in
Christ and retained." When I first read that paragraph some weeks back, it
stuck to my mind. And I contemplated how that could be true. As I continued
reading chapter 12, Fr James gave Scriptural support of the things that the
Orthodox Church practices because of her Jewish heritage, but are lacking for the most part in
the various Protestant churches. I further realized that I was missing a lot of
information that I had skipped over when reading the Bible; the ritualistic nature of worship, for instance. There were some
things that I still wasn't sure about, like that of icons (which is the usual nemesis
of the Protestant exploring Orthodoxy). But I was still intrigued and I decided
not to give up; that with time I would come to understand more.
Quite recently, I came across a Youtube video, "The Liturgy: From
the Ancient Israelites till the Messiah"; a comparison between practices
of ancient and modern day Judaism and the Christian Orthodox Church. As I
watched the video, Fr James' book came to my mind, and it clicked; from the
veneration of icons to the Eucharist to the chants and EVEN the vestments. I
saw the continuity of the ancient Jewish tradition in the Orthodox Christian tradition in this video. No one can deny the similarities between both traditions. One SHOULD note that despite the approximate 1,500 year-old schism between the Oriental Communion and the Eastern Communion, in this video it can be seen that BOTH churches continue with their Jewish roots.
As I continue my walk towards Orthodoxy, I hope that with time I will come to learn more about Ancient Judaism and how it shaped Christian Orthodoxy in contrast to today's Zionist Christian ideology that is lacking, to me, the depth that Christian Orthodoxy has due to the fact that Christian Orthodoxy is the fulfillment of ancient Judaism.
- Kassia
Diakonia
Sources:
Bernstein, Fr. A. James. Surprised by Christ: My Journey from Judaism to Orthodox Christianity. Conciliar Press.
Bernstein, Fr. A. James. Surprised by Christ: My Journey from Judaism to Orthodox Christianity. Conciliar Press.
Friday, June 27, 2014
Now That I am Orthodox - Ruth Obadiah
Today's blog post will be from Ruth Obadiah on her experience as a new Orthodox convert. She recently wrote a piece on her journey into Orthodoxy, "Why am I becoming Orthodox?" She also has recently opened up her own blog site, "The Orthodox Truth".
Now that I am
Orthodox.
One can be
forgiven for thinking “that is it now, baptized – all done, just carry on with
your life, you are saved! Go be happy!” Despite being an Orthodox baby, that is
not my understanding of the Orthodox Faith, not at all. This is the
beginning, not the end. I’ve just been born, not died. This is the beginning,
and the Christian life is hard. The gate is narrow. I am learning that, and learning it fast.
About 3 years
after finding Christ and investigating the early Church, I found myself looking
at Orthodoxy. However, there was still so much I needed to know. So I concluded
that I needed to speak to Orthodox people, clergy and laity alike. I needed
answers desperately, but I knew no local Orthodox people.
I decided to
use Facebook and dialogue with Orthodox people in Orthodox Groups. Speaking to
Orthodox people is a perfect way to study the Orthodox Faith, and how it is
lived day by day – in an objective and honest manner. This posed a problem however, the Church that
I was a member of – despite being full of people I love and who love Christ
passionately – was also a Church that was, and still is – very much against the
Established Church. You can’t get any more established than the Orthodox
Church.
So, I created
for myself another Facebook account and joined many Orthodox Groups – this gave
me the opportunity to study Orthodoxy without external and subjective
distractions. I started asking
questions about Orthodoxy, about the theology, how it compared to modern
theology. I started studying more intensively literature and writings from the
early Church Fathers – and I asked questions, a lot of them.
I often played
a game, a simple game of ask a specific question, and address it to several
Orthodox clergy from across the world.
The response I received staggered me, it seemed that Orthodox teachings
were uniform everywhere! How could this be? Surely some people must have their
own opinion on interpretations? And that is the difference I found, Orthodoxy
isn’t about picking up a Bible and deciding for ourselves what it means. After all, God is not a God of confusion – is
He?
Sadly, ignorance
has played a big part in the rejection of me from my old Church since leaving
to become Orthodox. Other people around
me saw the journey I was on, saw the beautiful deep quotes I posted every day
and read the many articles I posted about Orthodoxy – and they began asking me
questions. They asked me.
I have been
accused of many things and people now ignore me in the street, I have lost
almost every Christian friend I had, but the goal - the goal is so worth it.
God sees all things, He is my witness and it is to Him alone that I am
accountable. The gate is narrow, the Cross is heavy – Christ did not say that
it would be easy, did He? Never look back, never ever look back.
This treasure
that I have found, it never ceases to take my breath away. When I first realized that the world did not
revolve around me, and I found God – I was constantly sharing this with people,
this wonderful amazing God actually loved and wanted me, despite all the bad
things I had done. Now that I have found this treasure, the Church that even
history agrees is the one that Christ established through His Apostles – this I
also want to share, this beautiful gift.
So, here I am
on this wonderful journey. Continually discovering new things and every day I
am facing new challenges. I am studying, I am constantly being encouraged to
study by my Spiritual Father, both academically and things of my own choice –
i.e, the Scriptures, comparative theology and Church history. This goes against
everything I was led to believe before, as I was always taught that those who
educate themselves are so full of “head knowledge” that they lose the concept
of the Gospel. I can’t even begin to explain how much my understanding of the
Scriptures has changed, there is a depth to Orthodoxy that truly has to be
experienced.
You cannot
argue with recorded history. For the first 1,000 years of Christianity, the
world was Orthodox (the see of Antioch, Alexandria, Jerusalem, Rome and
Constantinople) – to argue with recorded history is as futile as denying the
existence of King Henry VIII because you dislike his creation of the Church of
England. Facts are facts.
Then, Rome
broke away from the other 4 sees, in effect becoming the first “Protestants”. Over
time adding doctrine after doctrine – until the Roman Church barely resembled
that of the early Church. It is hardly surprising the Reformation occurred. Sadly,
modern day evangelicals are basically doing what the Roman Church did – adding
doctrine after doctrine. Sola Scriptura has a lot to answer for. The Rapture
and the modern day interpretation of the state of Israel are two perfect
examples of this. Both are barely 150 years old and neither have ever been
taught in the Church at any time. The
true irony for me, is that despite the reformers hatred of all things
“Catholic”, almost all their theology is a convoluted branch from Rome. Who is
curious enough to research this…?
I had to ask
myself “who is right?” The Apostles and their Disciples – the men who actually
got their teachings from Christ Himself and faithfully recorded their teachings
in the many Epistles, like Ignatius, Polycarp and also through Holy Tradition? Or various men
who came nearly 2,000 years later whose theology not only disagreed with the
Early Church, but also with each other?
How can I be
true to myself unless I am being obedient to God? Compromising is not being
obedient, it is telling God that He did not quite get it right. Christ said
that we are to pick up our Cross, He did not add a footnote saying “unless it
becomes difficult or inconvenient, or makes you really unpopular”.
Now that I am
baptized, I have received the most precious Gift of the Holy Spirit, and I am
Orthodox. The desire to share this incredible gift burns away in me like an
enormous fire. The sacraments and guidance I receive strengthen me both Spiritually and physically. Orthodoxy is not emotional, it
is deeply Spiritual and every single day I am reminded of this. I am home. Yet my
journey has only just begun.
I am saved, I
am being saved, I will be saved.
Ruth Obadiah - Reverted Protestant.
Thursday, May 22, 2014
Why am I becoming an Orthodox Christian? - By Ruth Obadiah
Today, I have the privilege and pleasure to share with you the life experience, her reasons for reverting, of Ruth Obadiah, guest writer for today's post. Ruth comes from an agnostic back ground, but later on through a series of events transitioned into evangelical Christianity, and had been for about 4 years. Now, in a matter of 16 days she will, as she likes to say, "be going home" to Orthodoxy. She is preparing for her baptism into the British Orthodox Church, which is a part of the Coptic Orthodox Patriarchate. Please keep her in your prayers as she continues her walk with Christ.
Ruth
Obadiah. - Reverting Protestant
I have been a Christian for only around 4 years and I was a member
of a local evangelical non-denominational Church. Right from the beginning I had a love of
Church history. I loved reading about the Apostles, the Early Church and the
Church Fathers. This was a major factor
that led me to the doors of the Orthodox Church.
But, why do I want to become an Orthodox Christian?
Well, I truly believe that the Orthodox Church is the Original
Church – the Church that Christ established through His Apostles. History
proves this, and that her teachings have remained the same since the first
century. Recorded evidence shows that the theology of the Orthodox Church is
that of the Early Church, everything is fully available to those that seek.
Orthodoxy is for everyone – it is for the ordinary everyday person.
I am an ordinary woman, born into an ordinary working-class family; in an
ordinary working-class part of the UK. A quick look at the history of the Early
Church in my own country shows that England was fully Orthodox in its doctrines
for almost the first 11 centuries of Christianity. During this time, Orthodoxy
was practiced by ordinary average people, just like me.
The Orthodox Church was responsible for compiling and approving the
New Testament. In my eyes, this provides an enormous sense of reliability and
trustworthiness, something I have not found anywhere else. This is extended into the uniformity of the
teachings of the Orthodox Church, it doesn’t matter which Orthodox Church I
visit, or which Orthodox priest I speak to (and I have spoken to many), the
teachings do not vary. This is such a refreshing blessing. I love the fact that the Orthodox Church is
Apostolic, and that every priest can physically trace back his ancestry through
the Church directly back to the 12 Apostles.
One of the major attractions for me regarding Orthodoxy is that it
not all about “me, me, me” “I, I, I”. It is all about God. Everything about Orthodoxy, from the doctrines
to the worship – are all about glorifying God in His fullness – about
worshiping the Trinity of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.
I also love the emphasis that Orthodoxy places on the Divinity of
Christ, fully God, fully Man – always.
This is unsurprising, considering how many times this was defended
against heresies in the first few centuries – and how many Orthodox Christians
died defending the Faith. Orthodoxy
aims to actually “make” us holy, not to simply appear to be so.
One of the great blessings I found in the Orthodox Church is that
it meets you where you are, and guides you by the hand on a life-long
journey. Orthodoxy does not teach that
you must be Orthodox to be “saved”, or that all Orthodox Christians are
“saved”. Nor does it teach that it is
the only way to reach God, we reach God with our heart. This is refreshing and contrasts somewhat
with many modern evangelicals who often base ones salvation on who jumps around
the most, waving arms and speaking in “tongues”. This is emotional worship, not
spiritual. To think that a person is uncomfortable or standoffish with the Holy
Spirit for not wishing to worship in this way saddens me greatly, and shows an
incredible level of shallowness and ignorance.
In Orthodoxy, the worship is breathtakingly beautiful, and
mysterious. There is an unbroken continuity in the style of worship, with a
reverence and holiness unlike anything I have experienced before. It stimulates
all my senses simultaneously. It hasn’t tried to rationalize it - as in the
case of the Roman Catholic Church, nor has it tried to remove it in the way
that Protestants have. It is simply unchanged heavenly worship, with more
Scripture per service than you can shake a stick at.
During my initial research into Orthodoxy, my only real challenge
was a common one amongst Protestants, and that is the intercession of the
Saints. But, after much prayer, study and many in-depth discussions with many
Orthodox clergy – I soon overcame this hurdle and I now have no theological
problem with it.
I have struggled accepting just how far in general Christianity has
drifted from the Early Church, so much has changed. The gifts of the Holy
Sacraments have become mere “symbols” and the theology varies depending on who
is reading the Scriptures and how they interpret it.
No. God does not change, and
neither does His teachings. That is why He chose His Disciples and gave us His
Church.
My journey into Orthodoxy has seen me lose many friends on the way,
I will always pray for them. For hearts, minds and eyes to be opened – so that
they can see this beautiful treasure for what it truly is.
The narrow path is very narrow. As a person, I feel I have changed
a lot since my journey into Orthodoxy first began. I have matured, and I am
more aware of my (many) faults and I try (usually unsuccessfully) to address
them.
It is very exciting to wonder what the future will hold for me, an
Orthodox Christian. I don’t wish to
simply “read the Gospel”, I wish to “live the Gospel” – the first century
Gospel.
I am saved, I am being saved – I will be saved.
Monday, May 5, 2014
Intercession of the Zombies (Saints)
The first Orthodox Christian Tradition that I bumped heads with when I started to look into Orthodoxy was that of the intercession of the Saints. It didn't make sense to me that it would be permissible by God for us to talk to the dead, and much less in the spirit of prayer. For a Protestant, the dead are dead; they can't hear us nor can they see us. And what's more, it's forbidden.
Or so I thought.
Being Protestant, I am big on Sola Scriptura (or so I was...erhm). It is what defines the faith of the Protestant Christian. Without the Bible, there is no Gospel. Without the Bible, there is no Word of God; no truth to abide by. The Bible is the manual to every day living. Man-made traditions do not override the Bible; they are beneath the Bible. And if they contradict the Bible, one must throw the tradition out!
And intercession of the Saints to me (such as I was taught) was such a tradition; one that I thought was wrong and should be thrown out. I believed it to have been something that arose centuries later after the conception of Christianity. I did not believe it to come from Christianity.
However, after a few discussions here and there with a friend of mine who at time was also looking into Orthodoxy (and is now a catechumen - soon to be baptized... yay!), a little research on early Christianity (more on that later), I began to see that there was something deeper in that tradition - not only theologically, but spiritually as well.
The usual arguments are as follows:
"It's forbidden to talk to the Dead. Necromancy was actually punishable by death in the OT."
"Only God can hear and answer prayers. No one else is omnipresent and omniscient."
"Only Christ is our intercessor. There is no other than him."
"The Bible says that people are destined to die only once, and after that to face judgment. And that during that time, people are asleep. Daniel says that too..."
To be continued...
Or so I thought.
Being Protestant, I am big on Sola Scriptura (or so I was...erhm). It is what defines the faith of the Protestant Christian. Without the Bible, there is no Gospel. Without the Bible, there is no Word of God; no truth to abide by. The Bible is the manual to every day living. Man-made traditions do not override the Bible; they are beneath the Bible. And if they contradict the Bible, one must throw the tradition out!
And intercession of the Saints to me (such as I was taught) was such a tradition; one that I thought was wrong and should be thrown out. I believed it to have been something that arose centuries later after the conception of Christianity. I did not believe it to come from Christianity.
However, after a few discussions here and there with a friend of mine who at time was also looking into Orthodoxy (and is now a catechumen - soon to be baptized... yay!), a little research on early Christianity (more on that later), I began to see that there was something deeper in that tradition - not only theologically, but spiritually as well.
The usual arguments are as follows:
"It's forbidden to talk to the Dead. Necromancy was actually punishable by death in the OT."
"Only God can hear and answer prayers. No one else is omnipresent and omniscient."
"Only Christ is our intercessor. There is no other than him."
"The Bible says that people are destined to die only once, and after that to face judgment. And that during that time, people are asleep. Daniel says that too..."
To be continued...
Thursday, April 3, 2014
The Prayer Letter - Part 3 - Apathy: Consequence of Church Structure
Continuation of The Prayer Letter. For part 1, click here. For part 2, click here.
The last few things that I touched based in the letter were my thoughts on fasting, festivities, and praying. As I wrote this last part of the post, I realized that it would get pretty extensive. So, I decided to cut this part 3 short, and will later on expand on each point as a separate post.
I must confess that as a Christian, I have never fasted. Sure, I've skipped a few meals here and there. And at times, my church leaders occasionally encourage fasting. But it isn't something we practice as a congregation, something I believe that would be helpful if we did.
In my congregation, as most Protestant Christians make habit of, we celebrate Easter and Christmas to commemorate the Birth, Life, Death, and Resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ, similarly to the Orthodox. We don't, however, commemorate the deaths of the Christian martyrs on a daily basis, honoring them for having denied themselves, for having picked up their cross, and imitating them just as they imitated Christ. Paul said, "Imitate me, just as I also imitate Christ" (1 Cor 11:1, NIV) For a while, it seemed to me strange to honor someone I've never spoken to or seen, and much less a 'dead' person. But gradually, it started to make sense to me. If Paul calls us to imitate him as he imitated Christ, then what difference is there in imitating others (who are actually alive in Christ) who imitated Christ as well?
Like all normal people, I go about my daily living, but like all normal Christians, when do I stop to pray to God and consistently make him the focal point of my life? Which goes to the final point: prayer. In many Protestant Churches, prayer is suppose to come from the heart. Repeating other people's prayers is considered vain, and often times the words of Christ are used to resonate against such a practice: "But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking." (Matthew 6:7, KJV) However, I came to the conclusion that when Christ mentioned 'heathens' he certainly wasn't talking about pious souls in search of unity with God in holiness, something I see in the Orthodox Church. Further more, another conclusion that I have come to is "What difference is there in memorizing Bible verses and memorizing the prayers of others?" We are encouraged to memorize the prayers of King David (Psalms); if the prayers of other people reflect our own emotions and needs, than why not?
When I came to the end of the prayer letter, I came upon a very sad conclusion. I don't pray like I should. I don't fast. In all honesty, I don't imitate Christ, and much less honor those who have. I don't take Holy Communion every Sunday (and haven't done so in three years since the last time I partook in it), and I don't confess my sins on a daily basis, nor am I held accountable for my sins. What fruit am I producing as a Christian?
Indeed, is this the fruit of a Christian? If I were living in the 1st century, and lived this life equivalent to one of 1st A.D., would I be considered a true Christian? We all know the answer, and it's a big NO! Of course, with this I am not saying that all Protestants are like me, or have experienced their faith as I have. But the fact that I am the daughter of a Protestant minister of more than 20 years, born and raised as a Protestant Christian, bring these questions into light, "Is apathy a consequence of the structure of a church?" "Considering that the Orthodox Christian doesn't teach Once Saved, Always Saved, what does this say in regards to my salvation?"
Exploring Christian Orthodoxy and considering to become Christian Orthodoxy? May I suggest that when you consider Christian Orthodoxy, evaluate your spiritual life in the context of Christian Orthodoxy. A Prayer Letter might do the trick...
The last few things that I touched based in the letter were my thoughts on fasting, festivities, and praying. As I wrote this last part of the post, I realized that it would get pretty extensive. So, I decided to cut this part 3 short, and will later on expand on each point as a separate post.
I must confess that as a Christian, I have never fasted. Sure, I've skipped a few meals here and there. And at times, my church leaders occasionally encourage fasting. But it isn't something we practice as a congregation, something I believe that would be helpful if we did.
In my congregation, as most Protestant Christians make habit of, we celebrate Easter and Christmas to commemorate the Birth, Life, Death, and Resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ, similarly to the Orthodox. We don't, however, commemorate the deaths of the Christian martyrs on a daily basis, honoring them for having denied themselves, for having picked up their cross, and imitating them just as they imitated Christ. Paul said, "Imitate me, just as I also imitate Christ" (1 Cor 11:1, NIV) For a while, it seemed to me strange to honor someone I've never spoken to or seen, and much less a 'dead' person. But gradually, it started to make sense to me. If Paul calls us to imitate him as he imitated Christ, then what difference is there in imitating others (who are actually alive in Christ) who imitated Christ as well?
Like all normal people, I go about my daily living, but like all normal Christians, when do I stop to pray to God and consistently make him the focal point of my life? Which goes to the final point: prayer. In many Protestant Churches, prayer is suppose to come from the heart. Repeating other people's prayers is considered vain, and often times the words of Christ are used to resonate against such a practice: "But when ye pray, use not vain repetitions, as the heathen do: for they think that they shall be heard for their much speaking." (Matthew 6:7, KJV) However, I came to the conclusion that when Christ mentioned 'heathens' he certainly wasn't talking about pious souls in search of unity with God in holiness, something I see in the Orthodox Church. Further more, another conclusion that I have come to is "What difference is there in memorizing Bible verses and memorizing the prayers of others?" We are encouraged to memorize the prayers of King David (Psalms); if the prayers of other people reflect our own emotions and needs, than why not?
When I came to the end of the prayer letter, I came upon a very sad conclusion. I don't pray like I should. I don't fast. In all honesty, I don't imitate Christ, and much less honor those who have. I don't take Holy Communion every Sunday (and haven't done so in three years since the last time I partook in it), and I don't confess my sins on a daily basis, nor am I held accountable for my sins. What fruit am I producing as a Christian?
Indeed, is this the fruit of a Christian? If I were living in the 1st century, and lived this life equivalent to one of 1st A.D., would I be considered a true Christian? We all know the answer, and it's a big NO! Of course, with this I am not saying that all Protestants are like me, or have experienced their faith as I have. But the fact that I am the daughter of a Protestant minister of more than 20 years, born and raised as a Protestant Christian, bring these questions into light, "Is apathy a consequence of the structure of a church?" "Considering that the Orthodox Christian doesn't teach Once Saved, Always Saved, what does this say in regards to my salvation?"
Exploring Christian Orthodoxy and considering to become Christian Orthodoxy? May I suggest that when you consider Christian Orthodoxy, evaluate your spiritual life in the context of Christian Orthodoxy. A Prayer Letter might do the trick...
Labels:
1 Cor 11:1,
apathy,
Christian,
Church,
fasting,
festivities,
fruit,
KJV,
Matthew 6:7,
NIV,
Once Saved Always Saved,
Orthodox Church,
OSAS,
prayer,
Prayer Letter,
Protestant daughter,
structure
Saturday, March 29, 2014
The Cross, the Nativity, and Iconoclasm
Today I was reminded of the
emphatic need to examine myself in what I believe. "Examine yourselves to
see if you are in the faith. Test yourself." (2 Corinthians 3:5) It's
amazing how many Christians have a different perception of what the truth is,
and what interpretation they use to examine and test as genuine faith. And
today, all it took was a small box with simple stamps of simple Nativity
caricatures to highlight this notion.
Today, my beloved, hard-core
Protestant, wife of a minister, grandmother said, "That of the Nativity is
satanic." When she uttered such nonsense, my stomach churned and a taste
of intense disgust emerged in my mouth. You might wonder in what context she
uttered such blatant blasphemy? Let me convey to you the general context of
such a comment.
The women in my family have an
immense love for thrift stores. And whenever we get together, the possibility
of going thrift shopping is without fail. Today was no exception. However, on
this occasion, I decided not to go. We were visiting family out of town, and
near their house, downtown, one can find a few Christian Protestant thrift
stores where Christian material is abundant. My mother, my aunts, and my
grandmother went to scout them out while I stayed back at my relative's house.
An hour later, they came back to the house, we said our goodbyes, and then
departed back to our house.
On our way back home, my family
commenced to talk about their shopping, and my mother commented that in a box
that my grandmother bought with stamps contained icons. "Icons?" I
asked surprised, looking up from a book I was reading. My mother chuckled (she
is one of the few people in the family who knows about me exploring Christian
Orthodoxy), and said, "yes, icons." I paused and asked,
"grandma, can I see?", hoping to see some elaborate handiwork of
Christian Orthodox icons. My grandmother paused (she doesn't know about my
interest, at least I don't believe so...) and said, "what for?" I
persisted, and she reluctantly handed me the box.
I opened the box, eager to find
maybe an icon of some sort, expecting really Roman Catholic icons, as it would be
highly unusual to find Christian Orthodox icons in the area where I live. But I
found nothing of that sort; just stamps of the Nativity scene of individual
cartoon-like characters of the Three Wise Men, the shepherds, the Nativity
Star, and among these unrelated but Christian stamps as well as a stamp of a
simple Cross.
"Grandma, these aren't
icons..." I said bewildered, closing the box, and handing it back to her.
"They are!", she said emphatically. "They are just stamps of the
Nativity scene..." I said, as she took the box back. "It doesn't
matter. There is a Cross in there too. I'm going to burn them.", she
answered as she placed the box next to her. My heart literally jumped. Burn
them?!, I thought to myself, incredulous. And then, with a voice of
displeasure, she said,
"That of the Nativity is
satanic."
I looked up sharply, my eyes
widening in disbelief at the back of her head as I was sitting in the back
seat. Satanic? The Nativity? Even my mother turned her head to the side to look
at her mother, and said, "Satanic? Mom, there is nothing wrong with
celebrating the Nativity. In fact, we should celebrate it every day, not just
Christmas..." The conversation trailed off into the background as I
frowned and shook my head in disgust at the audacity of my grandmother's
comment, and went back into my own world of musings, and wondering how my
grandmother, who says she is a Christian, would find it ok to burn a stamper of
the Cross?
Of course, I know that those stamps
are actually icons, because they are images in themselves. But when I think of
icons, I think of images of the Saints with elaborate symbolism embedded in
them, conveying holiness. Not a child's box with simple stamps of cartoon
characters of the Nativity scene, which even so in a sense hold a holy significance
because of what they represent in their simplicity. Even before I started
learning about Orthodoxy and getting the gist of the beauty of icons, I don't
believe I have ever had such a negative view of images conveying Biblical
truths
So, to hear such words come from my
own grandmother's mouth shocked and displeasured me. To me, in that instance
she desecrated something that is holy by saying she will burn those icons,
along with the Cross, and topped it off with calling the Nativity satanic. From
where will I now draw my respect for her? Obviously, I will continue to respect
her, but believe me when I say it will be harder to take her seriously in
regards to the spiritual.
Iconoclasm is prevalent in my
family. And the foundation for such virulent belief comes from the Ten
Commandments,
“You shall not make for yourself a carved image or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or serve them, for I the Lord your God am a jealous God... "
-Exodus 20:4-5 (ESV)
Never mind that icons have a
profound and special place in the Bible, and that their place in the history of
the Church has been for centuries. Never mind that it was a Christian practice
to have icons of the Lord Jesus Christ and of the Saints. Never mind that the
illiterate learned from such precious images. Images are forbidden in the Bible, it's satanic! And that's that! (Please
note, sarcasm...)
How to test yourself if you are in
the faith when you think that the Nativity is satanic? And go as far as to say
that because of icons? It's not in my place to contemplate what that could
possibly mean for my grandmother as I know that I too have a sinful heart that needs to be cleaned. But it is alarming and scary to have heard those words come from my own grandmother's mouth.
And I ask myself now, "What will grandma say if one of her grandchildren reverted back to what she considers pagan?" Good question. Let's not think about that now.
And I ask myself now, "What will grandma say if one of her grandchildren reverted back to what she considers pagan?" Good question. Let's not think about that now.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)